PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2024Deleted Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Differential landscape of immune evasion in oncogenic RAS-driven primary and metastatic colorectal cancers

View Full Paper
ELEmil LouJXJoanne XiuYBYasmine Baca

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Oncogenic drivers such as KRAS extensively modulate the tumor inflammatory microenvironment (TIME) of colorectal cancers (CRC). The influence of KRAS on modulating immune cell composition remains unclear. The objective of this study was to identify signatures of infiltrative immune cells and distinctive patterns that differ between RAS wild-type (WT) and oncogenic mutant (MT) CRC that explain immune evasion in MT tumors. 7,801 CRC specimens were analyzed using next-generation DNA sequencing, whole-exome sequencing, and/or whole transcriptome sequencing. Deficiency of mismatch repair (dMMR)/Microsatellite instability (MSI) and tumor mutation burden (TMB) were also assessed. KRAS mutations were present in 48% of CRC, similarly distributed in patients < vs. ≥ 50 years. In Microsatellite Stable (MSS) KRAS MT tumors, composition of the TIME included higher neutrophil infiltration and lower infiltration of B cells. MSI-H/dMMR was significantly more prevalent in RAS WT (9.1%) than in KRAS MT (2.9%) CRC. In MSS CRC, TMB-High cases were significantly higher in RAS MT (3.1%) than in RAS WT (2.1%) tumors. KRAS and NRAS mutations are associated with increased neutrophil infiltration, with codon specific differences. These results demonstrate significant differences in the TIME of RAS mutant CRC that match previous reports of immune evasive characteristics of such tumors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lou et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e77418b6db6435876e8d03https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omton.2024.200786
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper