PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2024History of European Ideas0 citationsOpen Access

The sceptre of moderation: Montlosier and the emergence of the modern right in the French counter-revolution

View Full Paper
NMNicolai Von Eggers Mariegaard

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Intellectual historians have tended to focus on the most radical intellectuals of the counter-revolution such as Joseph de Maistre and Louis de Bonald, but the counter-revolution was an intellectually composite movement with many intellectual currents and ideas. In this article, I shed light on the composite character of the counter-revolution by focusing on one of its most moderate members, the comte de Montlosier. The article presents contextualised analysis of Montlosier's conception of moderation, his theory of politics, his critique of fellow counter-revolutionaries, and his ideas for a new aristocratic order build on public opinion and separation of powers. I argue that Montlosier's moderate politics reflected a moderate enlightenment approach to politics, which was neither wholly rationalist nor wholly traditionalist. Rather, it was an attempt to find a middle ground between the two integrating a conservative view of history with a sociological approach to power and politics. I furthermore argue that even if Montlosier was unsuccessful in his endeavours to moderate the counter-revolution, he nonetheless provided a moderate response to it that would become integral to nineteenth-century conservative and liberal ideas.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nicolai Von Eggers Mariegaard (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e779deb6db6435876ee0d1https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2024.2319391
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper