PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 24, 2024Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology4 citationsOpen Access

Individual benefit in heart sparing during DIBH-supported left breast radiotherapy

View Full Paper
SGSzilvia GaálZKZsuzsanna KahánFRFerenc Rárosi

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

IntroductionDeep-inspirational breath hold (DIBH) is an option for heart protection in breast radiotherapy; we intended to study its individual benefit.Materials and Methods3DCRT treatment planning was performed in a cohort of 103 patients receiving radiotherapy of the whole breast (WBI)/chest wall (CWI) ± nodal regions (NI) both under DIBH and free breathing (FB) in the supine position, and in the WBI only cases prone (n = 45) position, too. A series of patient-related and heart dosimetry parameters were analyzed.ResultsThe DIBH technique provided dramatic reduction of all heart dosimetry parameters the individual benefit, however, varied. In the whole population the best predictor of benefit was the ratio of ipsilateral lung volume (ILV)FB and ILVDIBH. In the WBI cohort 9–11 patients and 5–8 patients received less dose to selected heart structures with the DIBH and prone positioning, respectively; based on meeting various dose constraints DIBH was the only solution in 6–13 cases, and prone positioning in 5–6 cases. In addition to other excellent predictors, a small ILVFB or ILVDIBH with outstanding predicting performance (AUC ≥ 0.90) suggested prone positioning. Detailed analysis consistently indicated the outstanding performance of ILVFB and ILVDIBH in predicting the benefit of one over the other technique in lowering the mean heart dose (MHD), left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) mean dose and left ventricle(LV)-V5Gy. The preference of prone positioning was further confirmed by anatomical parameters measured on a single CT scan at the middle of the heart. Performing spirometry in a cohort of 12 patients, vital capacity showed the strongest correlation with ILVFB and ILVDIBH hence this test could be evaluated as a clinical tool for patient selection.DiscussionIndividual lung volume measures estimated by spirometry and anatomical data examined prior to acquiring planning CT may support the preference of DIBH or prone radiotherapy for optimal heart protection.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gaál et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e77b43b6db6435876f013fhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100746
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Selection of patients with left breast cancer for IMRT with deep inspiration breath-hold technique2020 · 12 citations
  2. 2Identifying breast cancer patients who gain the most dosimetric benefit from deep inspiration breath hold radiotherapy2020 · 7 citations
  3. 3Impact of deep inspiration breath hold irradiation on dose reduction to the heart and left coronary artery in breast cancer2024
  4. 4Deep inspiration breath hold: dosimetric benefits to decrease cardiac dose during postoperative radiation therapy for breast cancer patients2023 · 12 citations
  5. 5Cardiac exposure in left-sided breast cancer patients undergoing deep inspiratory breath hold radiation therapy2023 · 7 citations