PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 20, 2024Diagnostics9 citationsOpen Access

Assessment of Sepsis Risk at Admission to the Emergency Department: Clinical Interpretable Prediction Model

View Full Paper
UAUmran AygunFYFatma Hilal YağınBYBurak Yagin

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This study aims to develop an interpretable prediction model based on explainable artificial intelligence to predict bacterial sepsis and discover important biomarkers. A total of 1572 adult patients, 560 of whom were sepsis positive and 1012 of whom were negative, who were admitted to the emergency department with suspicion of sepsis, were examined. We investigated the performance characteristics of sepsis biomarkers alone and in combination for confirmed sepsis diagnosis using Sepsis-3 criteria. Three different tree-based algorithms—Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost)—were used for sepsis prediction, and after examining comprehensive performance metrics, descriptions of the optimal model were obtained with the SHAP method. The XGBoost model achieved accuracy of 0.898 (0.868–0.929) and area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.940 (0.898–0.980) with a 95% confidence interval. The five biomarkers for predicting sepsis were age, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, procalcitonin, and positive blood culture. SHAP results revealed that older age, higher respiratory rate, procalcitonin, neutrophil–lymphocyte count ratio, C-reactive protein, plaque, leukocyte particle concentration, as well as lower oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure, and hemoglobin levels increased the risk of sepsis. As a result, the Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)-based prediction model can guide clinicians in the early diagnosis and treatment of sepsis, providing more effective sepsis management and potentially reducing mortality rates and medical costs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aygun et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e785bab6db6435876f87a2https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14050457
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A proposed tree-based explainable artificial intelligence approach for the prediction of angina pectoris2023 · 30 citations
  2. 2The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)2016 · 28,810 citations
  3. 3Receiver operating characteristic curve: overview and practical use for clinicians2022 · 1,495 citations
  4. 4Light Gradient Boosting Machine for General Sentiment Classification on Short Texts: A Comparative Evaluation2020 · 181 citations
  5. 5Sepsis—A Retrospective Cohort Study of Bloodstream Infections2020 · 64 citations