PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 20, 20241 citationsOpen Access

Global Engineering Ethics: What? Why? How? And When?

View Full Paper
RCRockwell F. ClancyQZQin Zhu

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Despite the fact that engineering programs, accreditation bodies, and multinational corporations have become increasingly interested in introducing global dimensions into professional engineering practice, little work in the existing literature provides an overview of questions fundamental to global engineering ethics, such as what global engineering ethics is, why it should be taught, how it should be taught, and when it should be introduced. This paper describes the what, why, how, and when of global engineering ethics. This form is adopted from a 1996 article written by Charles Harris, Michael Davis, Michael Pritchard, and Michael Rabins, which has influenced the development of engineering ethics for over twenty years. In this paper, we begin by describing global engineering ethics as a response to the increasingly cross-cultural, international characteristics of contemporary engineering. To so do, we describe four fundamental approaches proposed by scholars and implemented in curricula: (1) global ethical codes; (2) functionalist theories; (3) cultural studies; and (4) global ethics and justice. Next, we explain the motivations for global engineering ethics: Neither educators nor practitioners can necessarily assume a shared nationality or culture among students or between coworkers. Third, we outline discussions about how global engineering ethics should be taught. One of the most prevalent approaches uses case studies with a cross-cultural and/or international dimension, or a form of case-study analysis that takes a "bottom-up" – versus "top-down" – approach. Finally, we identify spots within the engineering curriculum for global engineering ethics: standalone courses, integrated modules, micro-insertions, competence-based training scenarios, and extracurricular activities, such as study, research, service-learning, and humanitarian engineering programs abroad. As the world becomes increasingly cross-cultural and international, ongoing training in global ethics will be essential to both students and practicing engineers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Clancy et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e786f4b6db6435876f964dhttps://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--37227
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Teaching of Professional Ethics in Engineering Design2024
  2. 2Understanding Global Perspective Development in First-Year Engineering Students: Determining Educational Impact2024
  3. 3Connecting Engineering Ethics with a Shared Curriculum2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4Bridging Internationalization and Equity Initiatives in Engineering Education2024
  5. 5Engineering Ethics in Engineering Design Courses: A Preliminary Investigation2024