PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 20, 20240 citationsOpen Access

Path to automated validation of ENDF/B-VIII.1 Slides

View Full Paper
JBJesse BrownKKKang Seog KimFBFriederike Bostelmann

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We need to expand the variety of applications to rigorously test libraries. Advanced reactors: – Decreasing reactivity for 8.1b2 compared to 8.0, some unexpected nuclides causing major differences (F-19, Cr), no clear performance difference when compared to experiment. Depletion RCA: – High impact isotopes closer to 7.1 – Small improvement on average (U-5, Pu-9, BC FPs), worse for Am and Cm. Fuel reactivity: – 8.1b2 is higher reactivity at high burnups than 8.0, but likely under predicting keff for PWRs at high burnup.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Brown et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e78822b6db6435876faf9chttps://doi.org/10.2172/2406843
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1ENDF/B-VIII.1: Updated Nuclear Reaction Data Library for Science and Applications2026 · 14 citations
  2. 2Comparison of ENDF/B-VII.1, ENDF/B-VIII.0, and JEFF 3.3 Nuclear Data Libraries on Criticality Calculation Using WIMS/CITVAP Code2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Effect of the new ENDF/B-VIII.1 Nuclear Data Library on Criticality Calculations of the DNRR with LEU Fuel2026
  4. 4Validation of ENDF/B-VIII.1 Nuclear Data Files [Slides]2024
  5. 5Extending the Nuclide Inventory Validation Basis for High-Burnup Fuel with New Radiochemical Assay Data2025 · 1 citations