PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2024Aging4 citationsOpen Access

The clinicopathologic and molecular features, and treatment outcome of fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective comparison with type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma

View Full Paper
JBJunjie BaiXLXiaoyan LiYWYahui Wen

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Background: To compare clinicopathologic, molecular features, and treatment outcome between fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma (FH-dRCC) and type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma (T2 pRCC). Methods: Data of T2 pRCC patients and FH-dRCC patients with additional next-generation sequencing information were retrospectively analyzed. The cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were primary endpoint. Results: A combination of FH and 2-succino-cysteine (2-SC) increased the rate of negative predictive value of FH-dRCC. Compared with T2 pRCC cases, FH-dRCC cases displayed a greater prevalence in young patients, a higher frequency of radical nephrectomy. Seven FH-dRCC and two T2 pRCC cases received systemic therapy. The VEGF treatment was prescribed most frequently, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 22.2% and a disease control rate (DCR) of 30%. A combined therapy with VEGF and checkpoint inhibitor reported an ORR of 40% and a DCR of 100%. FH-dRCC cases showed a shortened CSS (P = 0.042) and DFS (P < 0.001). The genomic sequencing revealed 9 novel mutations. Conclusions: Coupled with genetic detection, immunohistochemical biomarkers (FH and 2-SC) can distinguish the aggressive FH-dRCC from T2 pRCC. Future research is awaited to illuminate the association between the novel mutations and the clinical phenotypes of FH-dRCC in the disease progression.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bai et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e78950b6db6435876fb6b2https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.205549
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper