PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2024Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice1 citationsOpen Access

Practices for respecting the newborn’s sleep-wake cycle: Interventional study in the neonatal intensive care unit

View Full Paper
NFNaima FaezFHF. HmamiSBSaı̈d Boujraf

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Objectives: Premature newborns are exposed to a great deal of over-stimulation, which can affect their cerebral development. For better sleep, certain practices should be recommended. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a professional training program on the improvement of practices promoting respect for the newborn’s sleep-wake cycle. Materials and Methods: This was an interventional study with a longitudinal, single-group, and before-and-after design. The experimental design followed a three-stage time series: Eight months before, three months after, then eight months after intervention. It targeted a comprehensive sample of 66 professionals. It took place between October 2020 and March 2022 at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of the Hassan II University Hospital in Fez, Morocco. It was based on an observation grid and a self-administered questionnaire, validated and tested with a Cronbach’s alpha reliability of 0.91. Results: The light environment showed significant differences between the 1 st and 3 rd step (3.3% vs. 45.0%; P = 0.02; confidence interval CI = 13.644–10.456) for knowledge and (13.3% vs. 78.3%; P = 0.01; CI = 14.412–10.888) for practices; the noise environment showed a positive improvement between the 2 nd and 3 rd intervention (31.7% vs. 41.7%; P < 0.001; CI = 5.954–2.913) for knowledge and (65.0% vs. 73.3%; P < 0.001; CI = 3.597–1.236) for practices, with an average of (8.98 ± 0.30–28.15 ± 0.48; CI = 3.806–1.094) between the 1 st and 3 rd step. Practices surrounding sleep and wakefulness reported significant improvement between the three periods (14.35 ± 0.22 vs. 18.10 ± 0.35 vs. 19.90 ± 0.35; P P < 0.001; CI = 4.647–2.853) for sleep and (13.25 ± 0.48 vs. 22.27 ± 0.59; P < 0.001; CI = 10.563–7.471) for wakefulness with statistically significant correlations between knowledge and practices (0.426**) for sleep and (0.606**) for wakefulness. Conclusion: The study demonstrated the positive impact of this sleep management and assessment program on the development of professional skills. Its implementation requires rigorous application of developmental support strategies for individualized care in neonatology.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Faez et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e78968b6db6435876fbf62https://doi.org/10.25259/jnrp_579_2023
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 10959 Measures to Improve Sleep Patterns in Neonates in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit as an Intervention to Enhance Prognosis2026
  2. 2The Challenge of Improving Sleep Practices in Childcare Services: A Randomised Control Feasibility Trial of an Educator Professional Development Program2026
  3. 3Impact of a structured sleep education program on mothers' knowledge and attitudes toward infant sleeping2024 · 2 citations
  4. 40825 Sweet Dreams Are Made of This: Improving the Family Bond with Better Sleep for Children 6 Months to 6 Years Old2024
  5. 5Improving Compliance With Safe Sleep Guidelines for Vulnerable Patients in a Community Safety Net Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit2026