PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 16, 2024Center for Japanese Studies Chung-ang University0 citations

The Modern Emperor Ideology and the Historical Particularity of the Korean Comfort Women Policy

View Full Paper
경강경자 강

Key Points

  • The analysis reveals that the Korean 'comfort women' policy was a coercive state policy driven by the Japanese military.
  • Japanese authorities forcibly mobilized Korean women from the bottom of the social hierarchy for sexual exploitation.
  • Primary sources were examined, including military documents and decrees from the Korean Governorate, revealing structural violence in the policies implemented by Japan.Human rights violations, discrimination, and abusive practices are shown to be inherent in the modern emperor ideology.

Abstract

This study examined the specificity of the Korean "comfort women" policy, which is organically linked to the modern Japanese emperor ideology. It also historically examines the actual damage caused by human rights violations, including the forced mobilization of Korean "comfort women." To examine the characteristics of the modern emperor's ideology and the strategies and policies that Japan implemented to rule Korea through the Korean Governorate, we analyzed primary sources such as documents, decrees, and notices from the Japanese military and administration, including from the governor general of Korea, considering the organic connection between the Korean "comfort women" policy and the modern emperor ideology.BR The analysis revealed that the Korean "comfort women" policy was a coercive state policy, the formulation and implementation of which involved the Japanese military, the Korean governorate, and the executive branch, and that the Japanese forcibly mobilized Korean women at the bottom of the social hierarchy as instruments of sexual exploitation. The issue of Korean "comfort women" is related to the historical facts of Japanese supremacism, contempt for other peoples, discrimination and exclusion, instrumentalization of human beings, and brutal human rights abuses, including forced labor, which are inherent in the modern emperor ideology.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

경자 강 (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e78f4db6db64358770071dhttps://doi.org/10.20404/jscau.2024.02.60.183
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Japanese Military “Comfort Women” Issue From the Perspective of Memory Politics: A Comparative Study of South Korea and Taiwan2026
  2. 2A Turbid River of History and Law: The Procurement of Women in Imperial Japan and Colonial Korea2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Yuha, Park (2024). Comfort Women of the Japanese Empire: Colonial Rule and the Battle Over Memory.2026
  4. 4Textual Traces of Transwar “Comfort Women”: A Feminist Critique of Lee Man-hee’s Seven Female POWs2026
  5. 5Comfort Women: The 1946-1948 Tokyo War Crimes Trials and Historical Blindness2024 · 2 citations