Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Purpose. To assess clinical impact and perform cost-consequence analysis of the broadest multiplex PCR panels available for the rapid diagnosis of bloodstream infections (BSI). Methods. Single-center, randomized controlled trial conducted from June 2019 to February 2021 at a French University hospital with an institutional antimicrobial stewardship program. Primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with optimized antimicrobial treatment 12h after transmission of positivity and Gram stain results from the first positive BC. Results. This percentage was significantly higher in the multiplex PCR (mPCR) group (90/105 = 85.7% %, IC95% 77.5 ; 91.8 vs. 68/107 = 63.6%, IC95% 53.7 ; 72.6; p<10 -3 ) at interim analysis, resulting in the early termination of the study after the inclusion of 309 patients. For patients not optimized at baseline, the median time to obtain an optimized therapy was much shorter in the mPCR group than in the control group (6.9h, IQR 2.9; 17.8 vs 26.4h, IQR 3.4; 47.5; p=0.001). Early optimization of antibiotic therapy resulted in a non-statistically significant decrease in mortality from 12.4% to 8.8% (p=0.306), with a tendency for a lower median length of stay (18 vs. 20 days; p=0.064) and a non-significant reduction in the average cost per patient of €3,065 (p=0.15). mPCR identified all the bacteria present in 88% of the samples. Conclusion. Despite its higher laboratory cost, the use of multiplex PCR for BSI diagnosis leads to early-optimised therapy, seems cost-effective and could reduce mortality and length of stay. Their impact could probably be improved if implemented 24/7.
Caspar et al. (2024) studied this question.