PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 13, 2024Environmental Research Letters1 citationsOpen Access

Globalising innovation through co-inventions–the success case of the Korean lithium-ion battery industry

View Full Paper
LPLeopold PeiselerYJYe Lin JunNSNicolas Schmid

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Radical innovations can shift the global competitiveness of entire nations. While countries typically struggle to absorb knowledge about novel technologies quickly, in which knowledge tends to be spatially sticky, an important exception is the fast catch-up of the Korean Li-ion battery industry from Japan in the early 2000s. In this paper, we conduct an exploratory case study on this surprising success story. Focussing on patent co-inventions between Korea and Japan, we investigate their significance, as well as underlying types of co-inventions and types of transferred knowledge. To this end, we proceed in four steps: (1) a Poisson regression model; (2) social network analyses; (3) patent inventor tracking and (4) patent coding. Our results indicate that Korean–Japanese co-inventions hold significantly greater influence than other cross-country co-inventions, including with patents without cross-country collaboration. We find a pronounced knowledge-transfer intensity during the early 2000s and observe two types of co-inventions: organisation-level and inventor-level. Predominantly, we observe inventor-level co-inventions, i.e. Korean companies hiring experienced Japanese engineers, that proved important to transferring sticky knowledge. Moreover, while most patents target the design of core battery components, the share of manufacturing patents are—contrary to theoretical expectations—highest during the first half of the observation period. We also discuss our findings and draw implications for policy, industrial and academic players, including industry localisation policies, technology-inherent catch-up strategies and directions for future research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Peiseler et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e7958bb6db6435877068d2https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad28da
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research2008 · 3,715 citations
  2. 2The Triple Helix2008 · 870 citations
  3. 3Re-examining rates of lithium-ion battery technology improvement and cost decline2020 · 375 citations
  4. 4A dynamic model of process and product innovation1975 · 3,536 citations
  5. 5Catching-up in green industries: the role of product architecture2022 · 14 citations