PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 9, 2025Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence15 citationsOpen Access

Enhancing credit card fraud detection using traditional and deep learning models with class imbalance mitigation

View Full Paper
TATahani AlbalawiSDSamia Dardouri

Key Points

  • The random forest model achieved an accuracy of 99.95%, demonstrating its effectiveness in fraud detection.
  • Experimental results show the deep learning model had the highest precision, indicating potential in reducing false positives.
  • The study utilized SMOTE for class imbalance mitigation, enhancing the predictive accuracy of various models.
  • Integration of focal loss within the deep learning model allowed better handling of hard-to-classify fraudulent transactions.

Abstract

Introduction The growing complexity of fraudulent activities presents significant challenges in detecting fraud within financial transactions. Accurate and robust detection methods are essential for minimizing financial losses. Methods This study evaluates logistic regression, decision tree, and random forest models on real-world credit card datasets, addressing class imbalance and enhancing predictive accuracy. A deep learning model incorporating focal loss was developed to further improve detection performance. The Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique (SMOTE) was applied to mitigate class imbalance, and hyperparameter tuning was conducted to optimize model configurations. Results Experimental results show that the random forest model achieved the best overall performance, with an accuracy of 99.95%, F1 score of 0.8256, and ROC-AUC of 0.9759. The deep learning model provided the highest precision, demonstrating its potential in minimizing false positives. Discussion A key novelty of this work is the integration of focal loss within the deep learning framework, enabling the model to focus on hard-to-classify fraudulent transactions. Unlike many prior studies limited to the Kaggle dataset, our approach was validated on both the Kaggle credit card dataset and the PaySim synthetic mobile money dataset, demonstrating robustness and cross-domain generalizability. These findings highlight the effectiveness of combining data preprocessing, resampling techniques, and model optimization for robust fraud detection.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Albalawi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e7ba40ccde5f1021f64a58https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1643292
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparative Assessment of Fraudulent Financial Transactions using the Machine Learning Algorithms Decision Tree, Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbor, and Random Forest2024 · 7 citations
  2. 2Proactive fraud defense: Machine learning’s evolving role in protecting against online fraud2024 · 11 citations
  3. 3Securing transactions: a hybrid dependable ensemble machine learning model using IHT-LR and grid search2024 · 39 citations
  4. 4Fraud Detection Using Random Forest Classifier, Logistic Regression, and Gradient Boosting Classifier Algorithms on Credit Cards2022 · 13 citations
  5. 5Classification of Credit Card Frauds Detection using machine learning techniques2023 · 1 citations