PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 10, 2025The economy strategy and practice0 citationsOpen Access

Factors of Informal Economy Development in Central Asia and the Caucasus

View Full Paper
ATArsen TleppayevSVSerge VelescoNKNatallia A. Khaustovich

Key Points

  • Higher GDP per capita significantly reduces the size of the informal economy, showing that income levels inversely affect this sector.
  • The analysis reveals that financial development has a strong negative impact on the informal economy, emphasizing the importance of digital finance.
  • Urbanization has dual effects, initially increasing informal employment but eventually reducing it in mature urban areas.
  • Trade openness positively correlates with the informal economy, highlighting risks of liberalization without proper digital customs infrastructure.

Abstract

Informal economic activity poses significant challenges to fiscal capacity, regulatory efficiency, and inclusive development across the region. The purpose of this study is to identify and analyze the key factors influencing the level of the informal economy in Central Asia and the Caucasus. The empirical database is based on panel data for six countries (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Azerbaijan, Armenia, and Georgia) compiled from statistics from the World Bank and the IMF. A panel regression model with random effects was applied, taking into account the impact of macroeconomic and institutional variables. The results show that higher GDP per capita significantly reduces the size of the informal economy (coefficient –0.00026, p < 0.001), confirming the inverse relationship between income and the shadow sector. Financial development has a strong negative impact (–13.43, p < 0.001), highlighting the role of infrastructure and digital finance in formalization. Urbanization demonstrates a dual effect: in its early stages, it contributes to the growth of informal employment, but in mature urban systems, it reduces its level (–0.41, p < 0.001). Trade openness, on the contrary, positively correlates with the informal economy (+0.019, p<0.001), which indicates the risks of liberalization without accompanying digitalization of customs procedures. The findings confirm the need for targeted state measures to formalize the economy through digital tax infrastructure, expanded financial inclusion, and simplified business registration procedures. Future research may focus on examining tax distortions and wealth inequality as factors sustaining the informal sector.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tleppayev et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e861857ef2f04ca37e3a66https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2025-3-6-18
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Survey on the Shadow Economy and Undeclared Work in OECD Countries2011 · 37 citations
  2. 2Measuring the Non-Observed Economy: A Handbook2002 · 381 citations
  3. 3THE FIGHT AGAINST THE SHADOW ECONOMY AND WAYS TO SOLVE PROBLEMS2023 · 1 citations
  4. 4Dodging the grabbing hand: the determinants of unofficial activity in 69 countries2000 · 1,391 citations
  5. 5Does the shadow economy increase income inequality in the short- and long-run? Empirical evidence from Uganda2021 · 25 citations