Background: The majority of parotid gland tumors are benign, while malignant forms are uncommon, affecting fewer than 1 in 100,000 individuals. The main challenge resides in the histopathological complexity and the clinical overlap between benign and malignant parotid tumors, which frequently results in misdiagnosis. Aim: The objective of this research was to evaluate the clinical and histopathological characteristics of parotid gland tumors at a Romanian healthcare center. Materials and methods: A five-year retrospective study was conducted, with the inclusion criterion being the presence of complete clinical, pathological, and surgical records. Results: Of 156 patients included in the study, 67.3% were found to have benign lesions (male/female ratio 1.14:1), and there was a slight male predominance (53.3%). Partial parotidectomy was the most common surgical intervention for benign parotid tumors (59.6%), whereas total parotidectomy was predominantly indicated for malignant tumors, with facial nerve sacrifice occurring in 20% of cases to ensure complete tumor excision. Patients with benign tumors were found to be younger. Malignant tumors were commonly diagnosed at stage III (36.4%), indicative of more advanced disease at the time of diagnosis. Clinical diagnosis showed a high specificity of 96.9%, indicating high accuracy in malignancy suspicion, yet the sensitivity of 56% indicates that a significant number of malignancies were not detected during the initial evaluation. Tumor size was found to be influenced by gender and correlated with surgical methods, suggesting that patient characteristics and tumor biology may impact surgical strategy. Conclusions: This retrospective study highlights differences in gender, tumor size, and surgical approach between benign and malignant parotid gland tumors, offering valuable contributions in terms of diagnostic accuracy and treatment patterns despite a limited number of malignant cases.
Ungureanu et al. (2025) studied this question.