PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 10, 20250 citationsOpen Access

PSR Out, Entitlement In: The Armstrong–Wright Argument For The Existence Of God

View Full Paper
AMAlessio Montagner

Key Points

  • The novel argument establishes the existence of at least one necessary entity, regardless of the status of contingent entities.
  • Building on metaphysical ideas from Armstrong, this approach does not rely on the principle of sufficient reason.
  • By using Wright's concept of epistemic entitlement, the paper argues that one can identify a necessary entity as God.
  • This exploration provides new ground for debates on the nature of existence and the identification of divine entities.

Abstract

Two assumptions have long been the Achilles’ heel of cosmological proofs: the principle of sufficient reason, and the claim to be able to distinguish personal and non-personal entities. In this paper, I develop a novel cosmological argument that does not depend on these principles. Starting from a premise inspired by Armstrong’s metaphysics, I establish the existence of at least one necessary entity. This conclusion obtains even if the existence of contingent entities admits no cause, reason, ground or explanation. Then, building on Wright’s account of epistemic entitlement, I argue that we are entitled to identify at least one necessary entity as God, even if we cannot ultimately prove whether such an entity is personal.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alessio Montagner (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e861907ef2f04ca37e4047https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202510.0218.v1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper