PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 11, 2025ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology3 citations

Mapping the Trust Terrain: LLMs in Software Engineering - Insights and Perspectives

View Full Paper
DKDipin KhatiYLYijin LiuDPDavid N. Palacio

Key Points

  • Findings outline critical areas for enhancing trustworthiness in LLM-assisted software engineering processes, and provide a structured overview of trust-related concepts.
  • A systematic review of 18 studies combined with analysis of 70 broader articles sheds light on trust dynamics, relying on insights from practitioners to identify gaps.
  • Surveying 25 domain experts helped to clarify the conceptual landscape of trust, trustworthiness, and factors shaping trust formation in LLMs.
  • Building more trustworthy software engineering applications using LLMs may support safer and more effective adoption as industry reliance on these models increases.

Abstract

The application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in Software Engineering (SE) continues to grow rapidly across both industry and academia. As these models become integral to critical SE processes, ensuring their reliability and trustworthiness becomes essential. Achieving this requires a balanced approach to trust: excessive trust can introduce security vulnerabilities, while insufficient trust may hinder innovation. However, the conceptual landscape of trust in LLMs for SE(LLM4SE) remains unclear. Key concepts such as trust, distrust, and trustworthiness lack precise definitions, factors that shape trust formation remain underexplored, and metrics for trust in LLMs remain undeveloped. To clarify the current research landscape and identify future directions, we conducted a comprehensive review of \(88\) articles: a systematic review of \(18\) studies on LLMs in SE, supplemented by an analysis of \(70\) articles from the broader trust literature. Furthermore, we surveyed \(25\) domain experts to gather practitioners’ perspectives on trust and identify gaps between their experiences and the existing literature. Our findings provide a structured overview of trust-related concepts in LLM4SE, outlining key areas for future research. This study contributes to building more trustworthy LLM-assisted software engineering processes, ultimately supporting safer and more effective adoption of LLMs in SE.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Khati et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e9b1b5ba7d64b6fc131fa7https://doi.org/10.1145/3771282
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper