PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 12, 2025Jurnal Meta Hukum0 citations

ANALYSIS OF JUDGES' CONSIDERATIONS IN IMPLEMENTING CRIMINAL VERDICT FOR THE CRIMINAL ACT OF RECEIVING STOLEN GOODS (Study of Decision Number 155/Pid.B/20245/PN. Sei Rampah)

View Full Paper
SSSuharman SuharmanHHHerlina Hanum Harahap

Key Points

  • Economic factors significantly influence judges' verdicts in cases of receiving stolen goods, highlighting systemic issues.
  • Judges found all elements of Article 480 fulfilled in their legal considerations, confirming guilt without justifications.
  • Efforts to combat receiving stolen goods include pre-emptive, repressive, and preventive measures aimed at reducing incidence.
  • Legal interpretations in Decision Number 155/Pid.B/2024/PN show the complexity of assessing mitigating and aggravating circumstances.

Abstract

The regulation of receiving the proceeds of theft according to the law in force in Indonesia is regulated in Article 480 of the Criminal Code and the factors causing the receiving of the proceeds of theft are due to economic and financial factors. The economic life of the perpetrator who is less able both in terms of economy and education. Economic factors are the most important element and apply generally to almost every case of receiving the proceeds of theft, so this factor is not too tied to the perpetrator, time, and place. Based on the research results, it is known that efforts to overcome the reception of the proceeds of theft are pre-emptive efforts, repressive efforts, and preventive efforts. The judge's legal considerations in Decision Number 155 / Pid.B / 2024 / PN. Sei Rampah are that all elements of 480 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code have been fulfilled and there are no justifications and excuses, so that they are found guilty, as well as aggravating and mitigating factors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Suharman et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68ebc91af2c3e4d8d926e3c8https://doi.org/10.47652/metahukum.v4i2.762
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper