OBJECTIVE The Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) were modified in 2020 to improve efficiency and safety in triage decision-making. The aim of this study was to present characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients classified under category 1 of the modified BIG (mBIG 1). METHODS A retrospective review of patients presenting with acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) to a level 1 trauma center between 2019 and 2023 was performed. Patients meeting clinical and radiographic criteria for mBIG 1 were identified. An additional cohort of patients was identified who were taking 81 mg of aspirin once daily (ASA81) before the hospital, but who otherwise met mBIG 1 criteria. Summary statistics and univariate analyses were performed. RESULTS Three hundred three patients were identified and classified as mBIG 1. The mean patient age was 54.45 (SD 1.17) years and 41.3% were female. There were 144 patients (47.5%) who transferred from an outside hospital. The median admission Glasgow Coma Scale score was 15 (interquartile range IQR 15–15). Patients underwent an average of 2.28 (SD 0.03) CT scans. There were 123 (40.6%), 18 (5.9%), and 126 (41.6%) patients with subdural hematoma, intraparenchymal hemorrhage, and subarachnoid hemorrhage, respectively, with 36 patients (11.9%) presenting with multiple hemorrhages. Eleven patients (3.6%) experienced hemorrhage progression. No patient underwent neurosurgical intervention. The mean Injury Severity Score was 13.12 (SD 7.04). The median hospital length of stay (LOS) was 1.01 (IQR 0.37–4.56) days, 75.2% of patients were discharged home, 24.1% were discharged to rehabilitation, and 0.7% died in the hospital. An additional 25 patients were identified who were taking ASA81 prehospital, but otherwise met mBIG 1 criteria. None of these patients underwent neurosurgical intervention and there were no in-hospital deaths. One patient (4.0%) taking ASA81 experienced progression of their hemorrhage but still met mBIG 1 criteria. When compared to the mBIG 1 cohort, the aspirin cohort was significantly older (p < 0.001), but otherwise showed no differences in demographic, clinical, or radiographic variables. The combined mBIG 1 + aspirin cohort was stratified by hemorrhage progression (n = 12). Hospital LOS was significantly greater in the progression cohort (p = 0.017) and fewer patients were discharged home (p = 0.001). There was no difference in age, hypertension, admission mean arterial pressure, platelet count, international normalized ratio, partial thromboplastin time, hemorrhage pattern, and aspirin use between the groups. CONCLUSIONS Hemorrhage progression was rare, including cases in which patients were receiving prehospital low-dose aspirin therapy. More data are needed that evaluate the role of low-dose aspirin in the triage of patients with mild TBI.
Kim et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: