PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 13, 20250 citationsOpen Access

No-Regret Learning Under Adversarial Resource Constraints: A Spending Plan Is All You Need!

View Full Paper
FSFrancesco Emanuele StradiMCMatteo CastiglioniAMAlberto Marchesi

Key Points

  • The proposed framework achieves sublinear regret, demonstrating the effectiveness of a spending plan in online decision-making.
  • General primal-dual methods are designed to perform better when budgets are balanced across rounds, indicating strategic resource allocation matters.
  • The approach includes a robust variant for worst-case scenarios, showing adaptability to imbalanced spending plans.
  • Performance is compared against benchmarks deviating from the spending plan, providing insights into competitive decision-making.

Abstract

We study online decision making problems under resource constraints, where both reward and cost functions are drawn from distributions that may change adversarially over time. We focus on two canonical settings: (i) online resource allocation where rewards and costs are observed before action selection, and (ii) online learning with resource constraints where they are observed after action selection, under full feedback or bandit feedback. It is well known that achieving sublinear regret in these settings is impossible when reward and cost distributions may change arbitrarily over time. To address this challenge, we analyze a framework in which the learner is guided by a spending plan--a sequence prescribing expected resource usage across rounds. We design general (primal-) dual methods that achieve sublinear regret with respect to baselines that follow the spending plan. Crucially, the performance of our algorithms improves when the spending plan ensures a well-balanced distribution of the budget across rounds. We additionally provide a robust variant of our methods to handle worst-case scenarios where the spending plan is highly imbalanced. To conclude, we study the regret of our algorithms when competing against benchmarks that deviate from the prescribed spending plan.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stradi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68ec51df42911f61ef8b1fe8https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2506.13244
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper