PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 15, 2025Novum Testamentum0 citations

Rethinking Taxonomies

View Full Paper
PMPeter MálikDMDarius Müller

Key Points

  • The article proposes a new way to understand the textual traditions of the Book of Revelation, shifting previous methodological approaches.
  • Previous research on textual history has raised doubts about existing taxonomies, especially regarding the Book of Revelation.
  • The study aims to apply the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method to improve the depiction of Revelation’s textual tradition.
  • Methodological scrutinies of taxonomies show the evolving landscape of biblical textual analysis, requiring updated frameworks.

Abstract

Abstract For centuries, philologists have employed various taxonomies to textual traditions they studied, the New Testament being no exception. In recent decades, however, serious doubts have been cast on their validity, particularly in the light of new methods such as the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method ( CBGM ). And yet, the Book of Revelation had stood on the fringe of such methodological discussions. The present article aims to remedy this. Firstly, the authors shall review the most salient previous research into the textual history of Revelation, with a particular focus on text types. After that, they shall outline their own proposal for depicting the textual tradition, informed by the application of the CBGM .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Málik et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68efbd16d61273c8652d8108https://doi.org/10.1163/15685365-bja10097
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper