PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 15, 2025Kerntechnik2 citations

Prediction of LOCA break sizes using LSTM architecture for pressurized water reactors

View Full Paper
YBYoussef BadrMAMay AbdellatiefANAhmed Nazef

Key Points

  • The LSTM model accurately predicts LOCA break sizes, achieving an accuracy of 80.684% within a 15% tolerance.
  • Training involved pressure drops and related parameters, resulting in a mean absolute error of 5.185.
  • The analysis leveraged the GPWR simulator's data from two circulation loops for improved prediction accuracy.
  • Findings suggest neural networks can enhance safety analysis in nuclear reactor operations, potentially reshaping conventional methodologies.

Abstract

Abstract Neural networks (NNs) and deep learning have revolutionized several fields, and nuclear safety analysis is no exception. The proper operation of nuclear reactor safety systems is crucial and is designed to meet strict safety requirements. Such systems are expected to withstand certain postulated accidents known as design basis accidents (DBAs), which include the loss of coolant accident (LOCA). As the LOCA involves complex fluid mechanics and heat transfer, the pattern recognition abilities of NNs allow for excellent prediction capabilities and the bypassing of otherwise tedious conventional analysis methods. This work investigates the deep learning techniques through long short-term memory (LSTM) architecture, for its ability to deal with time-series problems which include LOCAs. The utilized model is taught to estimate the size of pipe breaks within the cooling system based off of the corresponding pressure drops. A range of 0.5 %–100 % break-size-time-variant parameters were collected using the WSC Inc. 1,400 MWe generic pressurized water reactor (GPWR) simulator, using two circulation loops. Neural networks were trained on parameters such as loop temperature, pressure, containment pressure and Boron concentration. The performance of the LSTM model showed a mean absolute error (MAE) of 5.185, mean squared error (MSE) of 76.50, root mean squared error (RMSE) of 7.953, R 2 of 0.888 and Accuracy of 80.684 % within a tolerance of 15 % across 100 runs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Badr et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f01110f081da0584b5691chttps://doi.org/10.1515/kern-2025-0027
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Prediction of small-scale leak flow rate in LOCA situations using bidirectional GRU2024 · 7 citations
  2. 2Prediction of critical heat flux using different methods: A review from empirical correlations to the cutting-edge machine learning2024 · 24 citations
  3. 3Real-time estimation of break sizes during LOCA in nuclear power plants using NARX neural network2018 · 26 citations
  4. 4An Introduction to Deep Convolutional Neural Networks With Keras2020 · 10 citations
  5. 5Enhancement in the safety and reliability of Pressurized Water reactors using Machine Learning approach2024 · 21 citations