PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 16, 20250 citationsOpen Access

The Cosmic Dipole’s Troublesome Factor of 2

View Full Paper
JBJ. C. BotkeUniversity of California, Santa Barbara

Key Points

  • The analysis shows that errors in observational procedures cause a perceived excess in the cosmic dipole.
  • Application of a new formula eliminates about 80% of the discrepancy in quasars compared to the cosmic microwave background.
  • In radio galaxies, a corrected analysis removes only 30% of the dipole discrepancy, indicating a need for better flux cutoff methods.
  • After adjusting the flux cutoff, the predicted dipole for radio galaxies aligns with that of quasars.

Abstract

In this paper, we show that the reported excess in the matter cosmological dipole relative to the cosmic microwave background dipole is primarily a result of errors in the procedures used to extract the dipole from observations of radio galaxies and quasars. The basis of all the work done to date is a formula given by Ellis and Baldwin (EB) in their 1984 paper. The main issue is that this formula is only valid when applied to a collection of galaxies isotropic in the source rest frame whereas, in practice, it is being applied to collections obtained using a uniform flux cutoff in the observer frame. The result is a collection that is not isotropic in the source frame and so violates the conditions required for the validity of the EB result. We rst provide a qualitative description of the source of this excess and then develop a new formula that can be applied to the observer frame data set. Analysis with this new formula eliminates about 80% of the reported dipole discrepancy in the quasar case. In the radio galaxy case, the corrected analysis of the published results removes only about 30% of the discrepancy but we then go on to show that the remaining large discrepancy between the radio galaxy and CMB dipoles is a consequence of a flux cutoff that is set too low. After an upward adjustment of the cutoff , the predicted dipole in the radio galaxy case is the same as the quasar dipole prediction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

J. C. Botke (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f0492fe559138a1a06df79https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202510.0973.v1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper