PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 16, 2025Buildings2 citationsOpen Access

Synergistic Air Quality and Cooling Efficiency in Office Space with Indoor Green Walls

View Full Paper
IAIbtihaj Saad Rashed AlsadunFBFaizah Mohammed BashirZAZ Andleeb

Key Points

  • The active indoor green wall system reduced CO2 by 14.1% during occupied hours, enhancing air quality.
  • Volatile organic compounds decreased by 28.1%, indicating improved indoor environmental conditions.
  • The study monitored PM2.5 and cooling energy, achieving a 20.9% reduction in PM2.5 and 13.5% savings in cooling energy.
  • Strong correlations between evapotranspiration rates and cooling benefits suggest effective integration of green walls in building design.

Abstract

Enhancing indoor environmental quality while reducing building energy consumption represents a critical challenge for sustainable building design, particularly in hot arid climates where cooling loads dominate energy use. Despite extensive research on green wall systems (GWSs), robust quantitative data on their combined impact on air quality and thermal performance in real-world office environments remains limited. This research quantified the synergistic effects of an active indoor green wall system on key indoor air quality indicators and cooling energy consumption in a contemporary office environment. A comparative field study was conducted over 12 months in two identical office rooms in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, with one room serving as a control while the other was retrofitted with a modular hydroponic green wall system. High-resolution sensors continuously monitored indoor CO2, volatile organic compounds via photoionization detection (VOCPID; isobutylene-equivalent), and PM2. 5 concentrations, alongside dedicated sub-metering of cooling energy consumption. The green wall system achieved statistically significant improvements across all parameters: 14. 1% reduction in CO2 concentrations during occupied hours, 28. 1% reduction in volatile organic compounds, 20. 9% reduction in PM2. 5, and 13. 5% reduction in cooling energy consumption (574. 5 kWh annually). Economic analysis indicated financial viability (2. 0-year payback; benefit–cost ratio 3. 0; 15-year net present value SAR 31, 865). Productivity-related benefits were valued from published relationships rather than measured in this study; base-case viability remained strictly positive in energy-only and conservative sensitivity scenarios. Strong correlations were established between evapotranspiration rates and cooling benefits (r = 0. 734), with peak performance during summer months reaching 17. 1% energy savings. Active indoor GWSs effectively function as multifunctional strategies, delivering simultaneous air quality improvements and measurable cooling energy reductions through evapotranspiration-mediated mechanisms, supporting their integration into sustainable building design practices.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alsadun et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f0ba59c50c73ebef9fa7a0https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15203656
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper