PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 16, 2025Animals5 citationsOpen Access

Consumer Acceptance of Sustainable Cat Diets: A Survey of 1380 Cat Guardians

View Full Paper
JMJenny L. MaceABAlexander BauerAKAndrew Knight

Key Points

  • Over half (51%) of cat guardians feeding meat-based diets found sustainable alternatives acceptable, indicating a notable shift in perceptions.
  • Among 1380 respondents, cultivated meat-based cat food was the most preferred sustainable option, followed closely by nutritionally sound vegan options.
  • Strong associations were revealed between the types of diets consumed by guardians and their cats, highlighting shared preferences.
  • Information sources varied, with labels being the most used, but trust in veterinary advice was notably lower among guardians of unconventional diets.

Abstract

There is increasing awareness about the adverse environmental and ‘food’ animal welfare impacts associated with the production of meat-based pet food. However, little is known about cat guardians’ acceptance of more sustainable food choices for the global population of approximately 476 million pet cats. By surveying 1380 cat guardians, this study explored feeding patterns used by guardians, determinants of their cat food choices, and their acceptance levels of more sustainable cat food alternatives. The sources of information used by cat guardians to obtain information about the cat diets they chose were also investigated. Key results included: (1) 51% (620/1211) of cat guardians currently feeding meat-based cat food (raw or conventional) considered at least one or more sustainable alternatives to be acceptable, with cultivated meat-based cat food being the most popular alternative, followed by nutritionally sound vegan cat food; (2) the top five characteristics alternative diets needed to offer to be considered viable were good health outcomes, nutritional soundness, palatability, quality, and environmental sustainability; (3) diet types consumed by cat guardians and their cats were strongly associated; and (4) labels/packaging and veterinarians were the information sources most used, although veterinary staff may have been less trusted as reliable sources of dietary advice by guardians feeding unconventional diets. It should be noted that, due to the reliance on convenience sampling and the overrepresentation of respondents from the UK, of female guardians, of respondents with higher education and of vegan guardians, the reported relative frequencies of subgroups were not fully representative of the global cat guardian population. Association estimates were based on regression analyses to minimize any resultant bias effects.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mace et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f10ecee6a12fd042899a0bhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ani15202984
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Vegan versus meat-based dog food: Guardian-reported health outcomes in 2,536 dogs, after controlling for canine demographic factors2024 · 7 citations
  2. 2Generalized Additive Models2017 · 8,281 citations
  3. 3When Younger Learners Can Be Better (or at Least More Open-Minded) Than Older Ones2015 · 192 citations
  4. 4Rationalizing meat consumption. The 4Ns2015 · 770 citations
  5. 5The Acceptable R-Square in Empirical Modelling for Social Science Research2023 · 412 citations