PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 16, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Consistency of variational inference for Besov priors in non-linear inverse problems

View Full Paper
SZShaokang ZuJJJunxiong JiaZWZhiguo Wang

Key Points

  • Variational inference succeeds in matching convergence rates of exact Bayesian inference for non-linear inverse problems.
  • The study derives general conditions on PDE operators to guarantee optimal convergence under Besov priors.
  • Results indicate that the variational posteriors significantly outperform Gaussian priors by a polynomial factor.
  • Two specific nonlinear inverse problems, Darcy flow and subdiffusion equations, validate the theoretical findings.

Abstract

This study investigates the variational posterior convergence rates of inverse problems for partial differential equations (PDEs) with parameters in Besov spaces B₏₏^α (p 1) which are modeled naturally in a Bayesian manner using Besov priors constructed via random wavelet expansions with p-exponentially distributed coefficients. Departing from exact Bayesian inference, variational inference transforms the inference problem into an optimization problem by introducing variational sets. Building on a refined ``prior mass and testing'' framework, we derive general conditions on PDE operators and guarantee that variational posteriors achieve convergence rates matching those of the exact posterior under widely adopted variational families (Besov-type measures or mean-field families). Moreover, our results achieve minimax-optimal rates over B^α₏₏ classes, significantly outperforming the suboptimal rates of Gaussian priors (by a polynomial factor). As specific examples, two typical nonlinear inverse problems, the Darcy flow problems and the inverse potential problem for a subdiffusion equation, are investigated to validate our theory. Besides, we show that our convergence rates of ``prediction'' loss for these ``PDE-constrained regression problems'' are minimax optimal.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zu et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f12bfb2107091eab27a239https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2508.06179
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Uncertainty Quantification for Linear Inverse Problems with Besov Prior: A Randomize-Then-Optimize Method2024
  2. 2Adaptive inference over Besov spaces in the white noise model using p-exponential priors2024 · 4 citations
  3. 3A posterior contraction for Bayesian inverse problems in Banach spaces2024 · 7 citations
  4. 4A Bayesian approach with Gaussian priors to the inverse problem of source identification in elliptic PDEs2024
  5. 5Frequentist Coverage of Bayes Posteriors in Nonlinear Inverse Problems with Gaussian Priors2024