PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 17, 2025Geoscientific model development3 citationsOpen Access

Improved vapor pressure predictions using group contribution-assisted graph convolutional neural networks (GC2NN)

View Full Paper
MKMatteo KrügerTGTommaso GaleazzoIEIvan Eremets

Key Points

  • Predicted vapor pressures using GC2NN show strong agreement with experimental values, enhancing properties estimations.
  • The adaptive-depth GC2NN model achieves a mean absolute error of 0.37 log-units for specialized organic compounds.
  • Group contribution and molecular graphs enhance the accuracy of vapor pressure predictions compared to conventional algorithms.
  • Overall, graph-based machine learning techniques significantly improve physicochemical property estimation under data constraints.

Abstract

Abstract. The vapor pressures (pvap) of organic molecules play a crucial role in the partitioning of secondary organic aerosol (SOA). Given the vast diversity of atmospheric organic compounds, experimentally determining pvap of each compound is unfeasible. Machine Learning (ML) algorithms allow the prediction of physicochemical properties based on complex representations of molecular structure, but their performance crucially depends on the availability of sufficient training data. We propose a novel approach to predict pvap using group contribution-assisted graph convolutional neural networks (GC2NN). The models use molecular descriptors like molar mass alongside molecular graphs containing atom and bond features as representations of molecular structure. The model's group contribution component is a shallow fully-connected neural network which processes numerical molecular descriptors and complements the model's graph component. Molecular graphs allow the ML model to better infer molecular connectivity compared to methods using other, non-structural embeddings. We achieve best results with an adaptive-depth GC2NN, where the number of evaluated graph layers depends on molecular size. We present two vapor pressure estimation models that achieve strong agreement between predicted and experimentally-determined pvap. The first is a general model with broad scope that is suitable for both organic and inorganic molecules and achieves a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.69 log-units (R2= 0.86). The second model is specialized on organic compounds with functional groups often encountered in atmospheric SOA, achieving an even stronger correlation with the test data (MAE = 0.37 log-units, R2= 0.94). The adaptive-depth GC2NN models clearly outperform existing methods, including parameterizations and group-contribution methods, demonstrating that graph-based ML techniques are powerful tools for the estimation of physicochemical properties, even when experimental data are scarce.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Krüger et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f19f1ade32064e504dd92chttps://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7357-2025
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper