PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 19, 2025BMC Pulmonary Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Surgical lung volume reduction eligibility in an emphysema patient pool referred for endoscopic treatment

View Full Paper
CVChristelle M. VanderveldeJHJorine E. HartmanKKKarin Klooster

Key Points

  • A total of 193 patients, or 19%, met strict criteria for lung volume reduction surgery within a cohort of 1030.
  • Primary exclusions were the absence of approachable surgical targets (18%) and the presence of bronchiectasis (10%), affecting eligibility rates.
  • Among those eligible, approximately 46% were treated with bronchoscopic lung volume reduction, highlighting varied treatment access.
  • Providing both surgical and bronchoscopic options can substantially increase treatment avenues for severe emphysema patients.

Abstract

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) and bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) are effective treatments for certain patients with severe emphysema. However, treatment access varies across centres, as not all provide both treatment options. We aimed to assess the proportion of severe COPD patients referred for BLVR that could also be eligible for LVRS. A retrospective observational study was performed of the Groningen severe COPD cohort. Strict LVRS criteria included: age ≤ 75 years, BMI between 18 and 32 kg/m2, modified Medical Research Council scale ≥ 2, amount of acute exacerbations ≤ 2, forced expiratory volume in 1 s between 20% and 45% of predicted, residual volume ≥ 150% of predicted, total lung capacity ≥ 100% of predicted, PaCO2 ≤ 8 kPa, PaO2 ≥ 6 kPa, %voxel density score in any lobe ≥ 20% and a heterogeneity index of ≥ 10% (-950HU). Chest CT of the remaining population was visually assessed to determine target zones for surgery and any parenchymal changes contraindicating surgery. In this cohort of 1030 pre-selected patients, 193 (19%) patients met the strict LVRS criteria. Visual chest CT assessment of those patients, excluded 73 patients, resulting in 120 (62%) patients eligible for LVRS. Main factors for exclusion were the absence of approachable surgical targets (18%) and presence of bronchiectasis (10%). Among these eligible patients, 55 (46%) were treated with BLVR. Our analysis indicates that providing LVRS in addition to endoscopic treatment can double therapeutic options for severe emphysema patients, highlighting the importance of offering both treatments to benefit more patients. Patients who visited the UMCG between August 2014 and July 2019 have been included in the Groningen Severe COPD cohort (retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04023409 (15/07/2019), an observational cross-sectional cohort with the main aim to identify clinical phenotypes and endotypes in patients with severe COPD.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vandervelde et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f500b442a2eee15b0a0fb2https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03954-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for lung volume reduction surgery: an observational cohort study2024 · 9 citations
  2. 2Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: diagnosis and management: summary of updated NICE guidance2019 · 97 citations
  3. 310.1016/j.ysur.2016.04.0302000 · 2 citations
  4. 4Prevalence and attributable health burden of chronic respiratory diseases, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 20172020 · 2,326 citations
  5. 5CT-Definable Subtypes of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Statement of the Fleischner Society2015 · 652 citations