PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 20, 2025INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENDORSING HEALTH SCIENCE RESEARCH (IJEHSR)0 citationsOpen Access

Efficacy of Laser versus Formocresol and Ferric Sulphate for Pulpotomy in primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

View Full Paper
MGMehmet Ali GülASAbu Bakar SheikhSIShahid Islam

Key Points

  • Diode laser pulpotomy showed significant pain relief, with the lowest pain scores at 2 weeks.
  • Post-operative pain was significantly lower for laser (0.07), compared to formocresol (2.93) and ferric sulphate (2.20) (p < 0.001).
  • This randomized clinical trial involved 90 children receiving different pulpotomy treatments over a year.
  • Diode laser treatment achieved a 100% radiographic success rate, superior to conventional methods.

Abstract

Background: To compare post-operative pain outcomes following pulpotomy using diode laser, formocresol, and ferric sulphate in primary molars of paediatric patients, assessed through the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBS). Methodology: A randomized clinical trial was conducted at Fatima Jinnah Dental College and Hospital, Karachi, from January to August 2023. Ninety children aged 4–9 years requiring pulpotomy were enrolled and randomly allocated into three groups (n = 30 each). Group 1 received formocresol, Group 2 ferric sulphate, and Group 3 diode laser treatment. Post-operative pain was evaluated at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Results: Laser pulpotomy demonstrated the lowest pain scores (WBS = 0.07 ± 0.37) at 2 weeks, compared with formocresol (2.93 ± 3.14) and ferric sulphate (2.20 ± 2.54) (p 0.05). Radiographic success rates were highest for diode laser (100%), followed by ferric sulphate (95%) and formocresol (90%). No major adverse events were observed. Conclusion: Diode laser pulpotomy produced superior early pain relief and excellent clinical outcomes compared to conventional pulpotomy medicaments. It represents a safe, minimally invasive, and effective alternative for managing vital pulp therapy in paediatric dentistry.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gül et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f58f68ece7a5b64f471540https://doi.org/10.29052/ijehsr.v13.i3.2025.134-140
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper