PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 20, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Direct detection of electromagnetically interacting ultraheavy dark matter

JKJason KumarBMBiprajit MondalGMGirish Muralidhara

Key Points

  • Photon-mediated nuclear interactions in dark matter were constrained up to mass limits of 10^17 GeV.
  • Experiments like XENON1T and PICO-60 provided key insights on millicharge limits for dark matter.
  • New methods for discriminating nuclear and electron recoils have expanded sensitivity ceilings for dark matter detection.
  • The constraints define a significant window between direct detection and neutrino experiment limits for lighter dark matter.

Abstract

At a level too faint for astronomy, particle dark matter may interact with Standard Model states via the photon. We derive limits from direct detection experiments on photon-mediated nuclear interactions up to operator dimension-6, viz. , via a millicharge, charge radius, electric and magnetic dipole moment, and anapole moment, up to dark matter masses 10^17 GeV, where detectors become flux-limited. We derive constraints for XENON1T, XENONnT, LZ, PANDAX-II, PANDAX-4T, DarkSide-50, DEAP-3600, PICO-60, and CDMS-II, and estimate future sensitivities for the multi-deca-tonne scale experiments DarkSide-20k, DARWIN/XLZD, PANDAX-xT, and Argo. Special attention is paid to millicharged dark matter, for which we constrain new parameter space by deriving the ceiling on sensitivity to its electric charge, arising from the nuclear-vs-electron recoil discriminants used in liquid argon and bubble chamber detectors. This result goes beyond ceilings previously identified in liquid xenon and semiconductor detectors from electron recoil vetoes. In particular, the ceiling from PICO-60 closes a large window between direct detection and neutrino experiment limits for dark matter masses below 10^12 GeV.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kumar et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f5fcce8d54a28a75cf1d81https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2509.24938
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Probing Dark Matter Electromagnetic Properties in Direct Detection Experiments2024
  2. 2Direct detection and cosmological constraints of dark matter with dark dipoles2026
  3. 3New constraints on ultraheavy dark matter from the LZ experiment2024
  4. 4Direct Detection of the Millicharged Background2024
  5. 5Some progress & challenges for the direct-detection of sub-GeV dark matter2024 · 3 citations