PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 20, 2025Russian Journal of Legal Studies (Moscow)0 citations

Partial invalidation of regulations (based on case law of Supreme Court of the Russian Federation)

View Full Paper
EBE.N. Burnos

Key Points

  • Only a small proportion of administrative claims are sustained by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, indicating significant legal barriers.
  • Procedural requirements outlined in Article 209 of the Code of Administrative Procedure often lead to rejection of claims that lack formal adherence.
  • Successful challenges to regulations lead to legal precedents, aiding in the refinement of legislation and law enforcement practices.
  • Expanding explanations in Supreme Court resolutions could help individuals better safeguard their rights against regulations.

Abstract

The paper delves into the legal challenges brought against regulations before the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation under the Code of Administrative Procedure. The main idea is that, even though the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation is seeing a growing number of applicants submitting file administrative claims, the proportion of those claims that are sustained is remarkably small. This emphasizes that the legal system requires further refinement to provide stronger protection for the rights of individuals and companies. The author highlights several key points to explain the small proportion of sustained claims. Primarily, this is due to procedural and legal barriers encountered when attempting to challenge a regulation. The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation often rejects to consider administrative claims when they do not adhere to the formal provisions of Article 209 of the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation. These provisions include a clear indication of the contested parts of the regulation and their inconsistency with regulations of greater legal force. Interestingly, when a regulation is successfully challenged, such cases establish precedents helping refine legislation and law enforcement practices. The paper offers illustrative case laws, demonstrating both successful and unsuccessful attempts to challenge a regulation. Based on the analysis of these case laws, the author proposes recommendations for improving legislation, including the need to expand the explanations in the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on the partial challengeability of a regulation. This would allow claimants to better safeguard their rights by invalidating both specific words or phrases in a regulation and its extension to certain categories of subjects of legal relations. The paper highlights the necessity of enhancing legislation and the relative explanations to dismantle procedural barriers and bolster the protections afforded to rights and freedoms of individuals in Russia.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

E.N. Burnos (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f5fcd68d54a28a75cf1e88https://doi.org/10.17816/rjls678729
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper