PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 20, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Parameterized Hardness of Zonotope Containment and Neural Network Verification

View Full Paper
VFVincent FroeseMGMoritz GrilloCHChristoph Hertrich

Key Points

  • Determining the positivity of a function computed by a 2-layer ReLU network is W[1]-hard when parameterized by dimension.
  • Zonotope non-containment is also shown to be W[1]-hard with respect to dimensionality, linking geometry and computation.
  • Many problems related to 2-layer ReLU networks, including Lipschitz constant computations, are NP-hard and W[1]-hard based on parameters.
  • The results indicate that current enumeration-based methods are essentially optimal under the Exponential Time Hypothesis.

Abstract

Neural networks with ReLU activations are a widely used model in machine learning. It is thus important to have a profound understanding of the properties of the functions computed by such networks. Recently, there has been increasing interest in the (parameterized) computational complexity of determining these properties. In this work, we close several gaps and resolve an open problem posted by Froese et al. COLT '25 regarding the parameterized complexity of various problems related to network verification. In particular, we prove that deciding positivity (and thus surjectivity) of a function fᵈ computed by a 2-layer ReLU network is W1-hard when parameterized by d. This result also implies that zonotope (non-) containment is W1-hard with respect to d, a problem that is of independent interest in computational geometry, control theory, and robotics. Moreover, we show that approximating the maximum within any multiplicative factor in 2-layer ReLU networks, computing the Lₚ-Lipschitz constant for p (0, ] in 2-layer networks, and approximating the Lₚ-Lipschitz constant in 3-layer networks are NP-hard and W1-hard with respect to d. Notably, our hardness results are the strongest known so far and imply that the naive enumeration-based methods for solving these fundamental problems are all essentially optimal under the Exponential Time Hypothesis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Froese et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f6196ee0bbbc94fac3642bhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2509.22849
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper