PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 20, 20251 citationsOpen Access

Evidence for increasing dark energy in DESI from the Local Distance Ladder

View Full Paper
MAMaryam Aghaei AbchouyehMPMaurice H. P. M. van Putten

Key Points

  • Opposite results for dark energy evolution are observed from early versus late linearization.
  • Analysis shows dark energy may be increasing, contradicting prior claims of thawing by DESI.
  • This study employs joint analysis of LSS-CMB data to examine systematic uncertainty.
  • Further confirmation is expected from the upcoming Euclid mission regarding dark energy behavior.

Abstract

The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) provides a comprehensive survey of Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) in the Large Scale Structure (LSS), in stratified data covering a finite redshift range. Extracting cosmological parameters in a joint analysis of LSS-CMB data is hereby inherently a nonlinear problem. In particular, this nonlinearity may concern the unknown equation of state of dark energy w (a), defined in the general w (a) CDM framework. Nevertheless, a common approach is the linearized approximation hereto notably w₀wₐCDM, also applied by DESI. Here, we consider a potential source of a systematic uncertainty in this linearization due to non-commutativity between w₀wₐCDM and a posteriori linearization of w (a) CDM, identified with a symmetry in the latter, which is violated in the former. We shall refer to these as early and late linearization, respectively. We demonstrate this in the analysis of the Hubble expansion in the Local Distance Ladder (LDL). Strikingly, opposite results are found for the evolution of dark energy by early versus late linearization, indicating a thawing or respectively, increasing dark energy. It is unlikely that the DESI pipeline is immune to the same contradiction. Our results show rather than thawing, claimed by DESI, dark energy may in fact be increasing. Further confirmation is expected from Euclid.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abchouyeh et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f6196ee0bbbc94fac3651chttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2509.23168
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper