PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 20, 2025Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology15 citationsOpen Access

AI‐assisted basal cell carcinoma diagnosis with LC‐OCT: A multicentric retrospective study

View Full Paper
SFSébastien FischmanTVThéo VielJPJean Perrot

Key Points

  • AI-assisted LC-OCT significantly enhances diagnostic performance by +25.8 points in sensitivity and +16.8 points in specificity compared to traditional methods.
  • The study involved 43 dermatologists assessing 200 equivocal basal cell carcinoma lesions, indicating a strong collaboration across multiple centers.
  • Non-invasive LC-OCT combined with AI provided better results, especially for dermatologists lacking prior experience with LC-OCT technology.
  • Broader clinical adoption of LC-OCT is supported by AI assistance, potentially reducing the need for invasive procedures and improving patient care.

Abstract

Abstract Background Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin cancer, requiring an early diagnosis and accurate margin definition to prevent functional and cosmetic complications. Traditional methods using clinical and dermoscopic images (C&D) often rely on biopsies and histology for final validation. Non‐invasive techniques like LC‐OCT, enabling ‘digital biopsies’, are promising alternatives, but remain underutilized due to the expertise required. The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms is a promising approach to assist dermatologists in their diagnosis and support the broader adoption of such technologies. Objective We present a real‐time AI assistant for BCC diagnosis with LC‐OCT, which is, to date, the only real‐time AI model across all dermatological imaging modalities. The study aims to quantify the model's effectiveness when used by dermatologists with different levels of expertise and compare its performance with traditional methods and unaided LC‐OCT. Methods This multicenter, retrospective study involved 43 dermatologists in a double‐rounded quiz on 200 equivocal BCC lesions. Diagnoses were first made on C&D images, then with LC‐OCT or AI‐assisted LC‐OCT in a randomized manner. Results AI‐assisted LC‐OCT significantly improves dermatologists' diagnostic performance in detecting BCC (+25.8 points in sensitivity and +16.8 points in specificity compared to C&D), particularly benefiting those with less LC‐OCT experience, effectively bridging a 2‐year gap of expertise. These results highlight the potential for broader clinical adoption through AI assistance and underscore its promise in reducing the need for invasive procedures and improving patient outcomes. Conclusion These results support a broader adoption of LC‐OCT use in clinical practice thanks to AI assistance and underscore its promise in reducing the need for invasive procedures and improving patient outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fischman et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f64fbb2509bc8625bfb21chttps://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.70099
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Surgical planning with line‐field confocal optical coherence tomography for recurrent infiltrative basal cell carcinoma: visualizing subclinical tumor for margin adjustment2024 · 9 citations
  2. 2The AI doctor will see you now: assessing the framing of AI in news coverage2021 · 85 citations
  3. 3Visual inspection and dermoscopy, alone or in combination, for diagnosing keratinocyte skin cancers in adults2018 · 87 citations
  4. 4Line-field confocal time-domain optical coherence tomography with dynamic focusing2018 · 96 citations
  5. 5Optical coherence tomography versus punch biopsy for diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma: a multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial2022 · 38 citations