PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 23, 2025International Journal of Molecular Sciences8 citationsOpen Access

Disrupting the Gut–Brain Axis: How Artificial Sweeteners Rewire Microbiota and Reward Pathways

View Full Paper
RCRoberto CoccurelloEuropean Brain Research Institute

Key Points

  • Increased systemic inflammation linked to consumption of artificial sweeteners disrupts gut microbiota.
  • Akkermansia muciniphila and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii are reduced, impairing gut barrier integrity and metabolic control.
  • Neural circuits are rewired by non-caloric sweeteners, leading to deficiencies in dopaminergic reward pathways.
  • Microbiome-targeted interventions may mitigate negative health outcomes from artificial sweeteners.

Abstract

Artificial sweeteners, or non-caloric sweeteners (NCSs), are widely consumed as sugar substitutes to reduce energy intake and manage obesity. Once considered inert, accumulating evidence now shows that NCSs interact with host physiology, altering gut microbiota composition and neural circuits that regulate feeding. This review synthesizes current knowledge on how NCSs disrupt the gut–brain axis (GBA), with particular focus on microbiota-mediated effects and neural reward processing. In homeostatic regulation, NCS-induced dysbiosis reduces beneficial taxa such as Akkermansia muciniphila and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, diminishes short-chain fatty acid production, impairs gut barrier integrity, and promotes systemic inflammation. These changes blunt satiety signaling and favor appetite-promoting pathways. Beyond homeostasis, NCSs also rewire hedonic circuits: unlike caloric sugars, which couple sweet taste with caloric reinforcement to robustly activate dopaminergic and hypothalamic pathways, NCSs provide sensory sweetness without energy, weakening reward prediction error signaling and altering neuropeptidergic modulation by orexin, neurotensin, and oxytocin. Microbial disruption further exacerbates dopaminergic instability by reducing precursors and metabolites critical for reward regulation. Together, these top-down (neural) and bottom-up (microbial) mechanisms converge to foster maladaptive food seeking, metabolic dysregulation, and increased vulnerability to overeating. Identifying whether microbiome-targeted interventions can counteract these effects is a key research priority for mitigating the impact of NCSs on human health.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Roberto Coccurello (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f9f86eb2c35e10cc4e3e1fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262010220
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effects of Non-Nutritive Artificial Sweeteners on Gut Microbiota and Host Metabolism and Health-Related Outcomes: A Review2026
  2. 2Glycemic Impact of Non-Nutritive Sweeteners in Health and Type 2 Diabetes2026
  3. 3Common xenobiotics modulate gut microbial responses to low‑calorie sweeteners in vitro2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4UNDERSTANDING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARTIFICIAL SWEETENERS AND GUT MICROBIOTA - LITERATURE REVIEW2024
  5. 5Non-caloric artificial sweeteners: A mini-review of current perspectives on health benefits and potential risks2024