PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 16, 2007PLOS8,583 citationsOpen Access

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.

View Full Paper
JVJan P. VandenbrouckeEEErik von ElmDADouglas G. Altman

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalisability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendations to improve the quality of reporting of observational studies. The STROBE Statement consists of a checklist of 22 items, which relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional studies and four are specific to each of the three study designs. The STROBE Statement provides guidance to authors about how to improve the reporting of observational studies and facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of studies by reviewers, journal editors and readers. This explanatory and elaboration document is intended to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of the STROBE Statement. The meaning and rationale for each checklist item are presented. For each item, one or several published examples and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are provided. Examples of useful flow diagrams are also included. The STROBE Statement, this document, and the associated Web site (http://www.strobe-statement.org/) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of observational research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vandenbroucke et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/690928dce2a3c54d85885d3fhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Statistical Analysis of Case-Control Studies1994 · 119 citations
  2. 2Biased Estimation of the Odds Ratio in Case-Control Studies due to the Use of Ad Hoc Methods of Correcting for Missing Values for Confounding Variables1991 · 174 citations
  3. 3CASE-CONTROL STUDIES IN THE EVALUATION OF DRUG-INDUCED ILLNESS1978 · 125 citations
  4. 4Factors that explain the power line configuration wiring code-childhood leukemia association: What would they look like?2001 · 31 citations
  5. 5Contribution of trends in survival and coronar y-event rates to changes in coronary heart disease mortality: 10-year results from 37 WHO MONICA Project populations1999 · 1,446 citations