PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 9, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Accuracy of ringdown models calibrated to numerical relativity simulations

View Full Paper
FCFrancesco CrescimbeniGCG. CarulloEBEmanuele Berti

Key Points

  • Mismatch typically ranges from 10^{-6} to 10^{-4} for (ℓ,|m|)=(2,2), indicating strong model accuracy.
  • Analyses based on numerical relativity simulations from the Simulating eXtreme Spacetimes (SXS) catalog provide critical insights.
  • Study employs systematic time-domain calculations to assess accuracy in gravitational-wave models derived from binary black holes.
  • Increased modeling precision is crucial to meet future gravitational-wave detector sensitivity requirements.

Abstract

The ''ringdown'' stage of gravitational-wave signals from binary black hole mergers, mainly consisting of a superposition of quasinormal modes emitted by the merger remnant, is a key tool to test fundamental physics and to probe black hole dynamics. However, ringdown models are known to be accurate only in the late-time, stationary regime. A key open problem in the field is to understand if these models are robust when extrapolated to earlier times, and if they can faithfully recover a larger portion of the signal. We address this question through a systematic time-domain calculation of the mismatch between non-precessing, quasi-circular ringdown models parameterised by the progenitor binary's degrees of freedom and full numerical relativity inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms from the Simulating eXtreme Spacetimes (SXS) simulation catalog. For the best-performing models, the mismatch is typically in the range 10^-6, 10^-4 for the (, |m|) = (2, 2) harmonic, and 10^-4, 10^-2 for higher-order modes. Our findings inform ongoing observational searches for quasinormal modes, and underscore the need for improved modeling of higher-order modes to meet the sensitivity requirements of future gravitational-wave detectors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Crescimbeni et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/690fdcdaf60c54d04ea38041https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2511.02915
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper