PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 21, 2025npj Breast Cancer0 citationsOpen Access

Phase Ib study of intratumoral talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) in combination with chemotherapy or endocrine therapy in patients with advanced HER2-negative breast cancer

View Full Paper
LHLaura A HuppertAGAmelia S GliwaMTMadeline Tait

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intratumoral talimogene laherparepvec in combination with chemotherapy or endocrine therapy for advanced HER2-negative breast cancer.
  • Phase Ib trial evaluating T-VEC with various chemotherapy partners
  • 19 patients with advanced HER2-negative breast cancer enrolled
  • Safety and efficacy assessed with primary and secondary endpoints
  • One dose limiting toxicity identified (grade 3 neutropenia)
  • 12.5% achieved partial response per irRECIST 1.1
  • 43.8% stable disease and 43.8% progressive disease observed
  • Higher tumor infiltrating lymphocytes correlated with better response

Abstract

Abstract Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is an oncolytic virus that is hypothesized to enhance responses to systemic therapy. This Phase 1b trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of intratumoral T-VEC plus chemotherapy (CT) or endocrine therapy (ET) for patients with hormone receptor positive (HR + )/HER2- and triple negative (TN) advanced breast cancer (ABC) with injectable locoregional/chest wall disease. The primary endpoint was safety/tolerability. Secondary endpoints were objective response rate by irRECIST 1.1 and clinical assessment of local response. 19 patients enrolled (9 HR + /HER2-; 10 TN; median two lines of prior CT). Intratumoral T-VEC was administered with the following partners: gemcitabine/carboplatin ( n = 8), nab-paclitaxel ( n = 7), paclitaxel ( n = 2), or ET ( n = 2). Eight patients in the T-VEC + gemcitabine/carboplatin arm were formally evaluated for dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) based on pre-specified protocol criteria, and one DLT (grade 3 neutropenia leading to carboplatin dose reduction) was identified. Response per irRECIST 1.1 was evaluated in 16 patients: partial response ( n = 2, 12.5%), stable disease ( n = 7, 43.8%), progressive disease ( n = 7, 43.8%). Patients with higher pre-treatment tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were more likely to respond, and clinical responders had induction of Ki-67 in multiple peripheral myeloid populations. In conclusion, the addition of intratumoral T-VEC to CT or ET was safe in patients with ABC and injectable locoregional disease, supporting the continued investigation of direct intratumoral immunomodulatory strategies that can enhance local and systemic immune responses. NCT03554044.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Huppert et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6924e3ecc0ce034ddc34ecd9https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-025-00842-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper