PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 16, 2025Foot & Ankle International0 citations

Posterior Malleolar Fracture Fixation: Posterior Plating vs a Modified Anterior-to-Posterior 4-Screw Construct in a Cadaveric Biomechanical Model

View Full Paper
JLJonathan LiuNGNoah GilreathPSPhillip Schmitt

Key Points

  • To compare fixation strategies for large posterior malleolar fractures in a cadaveric biomechanical model.
  • Cadaveric specimens underwent oblique osteotomy and ligament resection to simulate fractures.
  • Specimens were fixed using either a modified anterior-posterior 4-screw construct or posterior plating.
  • Biomechanical testing included axial loading for 50,000 cycles and subsequent load to failure measurements.
  • Early failures of 2 specimens in the plate group due to displacement over 2 mm.
  • No significant difference in displacement between screw and plate constructs.
  • Maximum load to failure was comparable between the two fixation strategies, making them equally effective.

Abstract

Background: There continues to be controversy regarding the optimal fixation strategy of large posterior malleolar fractures while treating trimalleolar ankle fractures. This study compared the biomechanical stability in a cadaveric model of a modified anterior-posterior (AP) 4-screw construct vs posterior plate fixation of Mason 2A posterior malleolar fractures. Methods: Twenty fresh frozen human cadaveric below-knee specimens were prepared with an oblique osteotomy of the posterior malleolus, resection of medial and lateral ankle ligaments, and posterior dislocation of the tibiotalar joint to produce unstable Mason 2A posterior malleolar fractures. Specimens were fixed with either a modified AP 4-screw construct or with a 5-hole one-third tubular plate with 4 cortical screws. The specimens were axially loaded in neutral ankle position for 50 000 cycles to simulate protected weightbearing, then loaded to failure in 20 degrees of plantarflexion. Fracture displacement and load to failure were recorded. Results: Two specimens from the plate group had early failure with displacement at the fracture site >2 mm; otherwise, there was no difference in displacement between the 2 constructs after axial cyclic loading (screws, 1.32 ± 0.26 mm vs plate, 1.26 ± 0.48 mm, P = .82). Additionally, there was no difference in the load to failure (screws, 3856 ± 617 N vs plate, 3939 ± 569 N, P = .81). Maximum load to failure was statistically equivocal between the 2 constructs (screws, 4867 ± 718 N vs plate, 4862 ± 1020 N, P = .99). Conclusion: For the fixation of large, unstable Mason 2A posterior malleolar fractures involving roughly 50% of the articular surface, our modified AP 4-screw construct may offer similar biomechanical stability while avoiding prone positioning and additional posterior surgical exposures associated with posterior plating. Clinical Relevance: This cadaveric study demonstrates that a modified anterior-posterior 4-screw construct provides biomechanical stability equivalent to posterior plating for large posterior malleolar fractures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/692509ffc0ce034ddc353393https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007251386366
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper