PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 11, 2025International Journal of Engine Research0 citations

Computational fluid dynamics-based feed-forward control of multi-fuel energy-assisted compression ignition engines for sustainable aviation

View Full Paper
SNSai Ranjeet NarayananSRSathya Aswath Govind RajuCKChol-Bum Mike Kweon

Key Points

  • The study reveals a framework for optimizing feed-forward control using computational fluid dynamics.
  • Data-driven control models showed high qualitative agreement between virtual and experimental results.
  • Assessment using physics-based virtual engines supplemented data generation and model testing effectively.
  • This approach supports the development of robust control systems for improving engine performance in aviation.

Abstract

Multi-fuel compression ignition (CI) engines are expected to play a vital role in improving the versatility and operational range of aviation propulsion systems. These engines are required to function efficiently across a broad range of fuel specifications, such as low cetane number (CN) sustainable aviation fuels (SAF). Due to challenges in igniting low CN fuels at high altitude conditions, ignition assistants such as glow plugs are used to enhance combustion. In order to achieve the desired performance, the engine control system needs to optimize parameters such as the fuel injection and ignition assistant settings. Data-driven control models such as Gaussian process (GP) regression are popularly used to represent the physical system, and usually require a comprehensive training dataset. Typically, such datasets are generated through physical experiments, which can often be challenging for a broad range of conditions and parameters. Furthermore, testing control models requires physical proximity of the controller and the engine, which is another challenge. A viable solution to these challenges is to utilize physics-based virtual engines to supplement both data generation and model testing. This study proposes a highly practical framework which couples computational fluid dynamics (CFD) with a feed-forward control model for both training and testing of multi-fuel engines. The results from the virtual testing were compared with real fuel-switch experimental results, and high qualitative agreement was observed between the two. Additionally, the feed-forward control models developed from CFD and experimental data are cross-validated against each other, where the GP models trained from the two data sources serve as two engine surrogates. A high degree of similarity in trends and compatibility between the CFD- and experiment-based models are observed, lending confidence in using virtually trained control models in real systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Narayanan et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69252ea3c0ce034ddc3566f8https://doi.org/10.1177/14680874251388224
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A misfire-integrated Gaussian process (MInt-GP) emulator for energy-assisted compression ignition (EACI) engines with varying cetane number jet fuels2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2Iso-surface sampler: Bayesian optimization-based sampling framework for controlling multi-fuel compression ignition engines2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3Control of combustion distributions in compression-ignition engines using rate-constrained model predictive control with reference preview2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4Energy-oriented surrogate modeling and constrained multi-objective optimization of a fumigation-assisted compression ignition engine2026
  5. 5Automatic Fuel Flow Regulation System for the Combustion Chamber under Varying Operating Conditions Based on a Neural Nitrogen Oxide Sensor2024