PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 10, 2025Physical review. D/Physical review. D.0 citationsOpen Access

Bayesian analysis of the neutron star equation of state and model comparison: Insights from PSR J 0437 + 4715 , PSR J 0614 + 3329 , and other multiphysics data

View Full Paper
IAImam, Sk Md AdilPKPatra, N. K.

Key Points

  • Neutron star equation of state is constrained through Bayesian analysis with various astrophysical data.
  • Analysis indicates a strong dependency on heavy-ion collisions and empirical nuclear data for accuracy.
  • Bayesian model comparison shows the Skyrme model is favored for combined scenarios, with significant symmetry energy parameters determined.
  • Findings reveal precise mass-radius and tidal deformability estimates for a 1.4 solar mass neutron star, enhancing our understanding of neutron stars.

Abstract

We perform a comprehensive Bayesian analysis to constrain the neutron star (NS) equation of state (EoS) using a wide range of terrestrial and astrophysical data. The terrestrial inputs include quantities related to symmetric nuclear matter (SNM) and symmetry energy up to two times saturation density (ρ₀0. 16 fm^-3), derived from finite nuclei and heavy-ion collisions (HICs). The astrophysical constraints incorporate NS radii and tidal deformabilities from recent NICER observations and GW170817, respectively. We consider five different EoS models: Taylor, n/3, Skyrme, RMF, and sound speed (CS), are analyzed by sequentially updating the priors with (i) χEFT based pure neutron matter, (ii) terrestrial, empirical and earlier astrophysical data, (iii) case (ii) including NICER radii of PSR J0437+4715 and J0614+3329, (iv) all data combined, and (v) excluding empirical nuclear inputs. We also perform Bayesian model comparison which favors the Skyrme model under all combined data (scenario (iv) ), yielding tight constraints on symmetry energy parameters: L₀ = 56 3~MeV, Kₒₘ₌₀ = -132 15~MeV and also on SNM parameters: K₀ = 265 12~MeV, Q₀ = -366 43~MeV. The mass-radius and mass-tidal deformability posterior distributions are also well constrained. The radius and tidal deformability of a 1. 4\, M_ neutron star are found to be R₁. ₄ = 11. 85 0. 11~km and Λ₁. ₄ = 354 25, respectively.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Adil et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69253a29c0ce034ddc3575a0https://doi.org/10.1103/2fz9-xlv1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper