PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Analyzing the Doctoral Candidates' Level of Efforts to 'Leapfrog' Their Dissertation Accomplishment Needs

View Full Paper
HHHermayawati Hermayawati

Key Points

  • The study aims to analyze doctoral candidates' levels of effort in completing their dissertations and overcoming associated challenges.
  • Conducted a multi-case study with six doctoral candidates from Indonesian and overseas universities.
  • Gathered data through in-depth observations during the dissertation writing process.
  • Analyzed data descriptively using member checking.
  • Intrinsic motivation significantly impacts sustained effort (67%-87% among five candidates).
  • Clear goals and shorter timelines facilitate completion, while extended periods hinder progress.
  • Effective practices identified include goal-setting, persistence, and community engagement.

Abstract

Abstract. Completing a doctoral program is a significant challenge faced by many doctoral candidates worldwide. This multi-case study explores the level of effort demonstrated by doctoral candidates in overcoming challenges to complete their dissertations as one of the scientific writing works, which must be accomplished to achieve their doctoral degrees. The six doctoral candidates who were in process of finishing their dissertations, were involved in this study. In this case, three persons studied at an Indonesian state university while the three others studied at overseas universities. One of the six doctoral candidates is Malaysian while the five others are Indonesian. In-depth observations during their dissertation writing process were conducted to gather the data purposively. The gathered data were analyzed descriptively using member checking. This study revealed three key aspects of doctoral success. First, intrinsic motivation and strong intrinsic motivation (67%-87%) among five participants supported sustained effort, while low intrinsic motivation (37%) hindered progress. Second, concerning goals and study periods, clear goals and shorter timelines (e.g., four years) facilitated completion, whereas low goal focus and extended periods (over seven years) impeded progress. Third, concerning strategies for success, effective practices included goal-setting, persistence, and community engagement. Resilience was evident in some participants despite extended timelines, while lack of intervention strategies contributed to failure. These findings offer valuable insights for improving doctoral education practices. However, future studies are recommended to involve more participants and employ other scoring rubrics to measure doctoral candidates level of effort. Keywords: Doctoral candidates; doctoral student; leapfrogging; level of effort; member-checking

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hermayawati Hermayawati (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6925572cc0ce034ddc35a5c3https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17608975
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper