PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 28, 2025TTR traduction terminologie rédaction0 citationsOpen Access

Translating Ekphrastic Precarity

View Full Paper
CCChristophe Collard

Key Points

  • Ekphrasis highlights the complexity of representing visual art through language, and invites deeper engagement.
  • Translation serves as a multidisciplinary approach to understanding the nuances of artistic expression and signification.
  • This analysis focuses on the epistemological challenges faced when interpreting hybrid art forms, especially in multilingual environments.
  • The findings may inspire new frameworks for translators by expanding their conceptual toolkit to tackle complex representations.

Abstract

In his first-century AD Progymnasmata , Theon defines ekphrasis as bringing “what is illustrated vividly before one’s sight.” Today, the term tends to be more narrowly associated with literary descriptions of visual art. Either way, ekphrasis foregrounds a double representation given that “what it represents in words must itself be ‘ representational ’ ” (Heffernan, 1993; my italics). The 2021 book Le tournoiement des ombres ( The Swirling of Shadows , 2024) by American visual artist Holley Chirot and Luxembourg poet/gallerist André Simoncini could prima facie be considered a classic case of ekphrasis, with its 29 poems and equal number of engravings. The images, though, depict a dreamlike, enigmatic world of hybrid creatures in constant metamorphosis: half-beasts, half-humans, and sometimes half-objects that weightlessly form or float in chimerical places. Difficult as it is to “represent” a representationality so inherently precarious, the ekphrastic logic is further problematized by Simoncini’s poetic language in which vocables bounce off one another in a swirling storm of paradoxically hyper-precise lexicality. It is an invitation for the reader to engage with a self-reflexive work, reflect on the precarity of intersemiotic interpretations, and participate in a dialogue addressing the very fundaments of signification. A Luxembourg-Italian hybrid living and working in the multilingual microcosm of Luxembourg City, André Simoncini is also a translator by training. Accordingly, his poetic experimentation partly explains his predilection for precarity and defiance of dominant discourses. Grounded in an understanding of translation as a multidisciplinary balancing act, his work encourages its translators to reassess the fundamentals of their craft. This article retraces a practice-based journey—from recognizing the book’s intrinsic complexity to tackling its stylistic and epistemological challenges— with the aim of mining the work’s heuristic potential and expanding the translator’s conceptual toolkit.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Christophe Collard (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6928f113a65b730b9ea79f13https://doi.org/10.7202/1121677ar
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper