PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 30, 2025Science1 citations

Reranking partisan animosity in algorithmic social media feeds alters affective polarization

View Full Paper
TPTiziano PiccardiMSMartin SaveskiCJChenyan Jia

Key Points

  • Polarization decreased by over 2 points on a 100-point scale due to altered exposure.
  • The field experiment involved 1256 participants during the 2024 US presidential campaign.
  • Using a large language model, the study reranked social media feeds to evaluate partisan animosity.
  • This research highlights the importance of independent evaluations of ranking interventions.

Abstract

Today, social media platforms hold the sole power to study the effects of feed-ranking algorithms. We developed a platform-independent method that reranks participants’ feeds in real time and used this method to conduct a preregistered 10-day field experiment with 1256 participants on X during the 2024 US presidential campaign. Our experiment used a large language model to rerank posts that expressed antidemocratic attitudes and partisan animosity (AAPA). Decreasing or increasing AAPA exposure shifted out-party partisan animosity by more than 2 points on a 100-point feeling thermometer, with no detectable differences across party lines, providing causal evidence that exposure to AAPA content alters affective polarization. This work establishes a method to study feed algorithms without requiring platform cooperation, enabling independent evaluation of ranking interventions in naturalistic settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Piccardi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/692b94261d383f2b2a3782f7https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adu5584
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper