PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 4, 2025Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly7 citationsOpen Access

Beyond Credibility: The Effects of Different Forms of Visual Disinformation

View Full Paper
TWTeresa WeikmannJEJana Laura EgelhoferSLSophie Lecheler

Key Points

  • Deepfakes and cheapfakes significantly influenced misperceptions regarding a politician, altering public perception.
  • The study found that both forms of visual disinformation harmed attitudes towards the politician despite low credibility.
  • Experiments assessed cognitive effects of different visual disinformation types on political perceptions and credibility.
  • Findings highlight the need for enhanced awareness and understanding of visual disinformation in media consumption.

Abstract

Deepfakes dominate discussions about manipulated videos, but other forms of visual disinformation are more prevalent and less understood. Moreover, deception is often assessed through measuring credibility, overlooking cognitive effects like misperceptions and attitude changes. To address these gaps, an online experiment ( N = 802) examined visual disinformation’s effects on credibility, misperceptions, and perceptions of a politician. The study compared a deepfake (machine learning manipulation), a cheapfake (rudimentary manipulation), and a decontextualized video (false context), all portraying the same politician and false message. Despite low in credibility, the deepfake and cheapfake caused a misperception, with the deepfake harming perceptions of the politician.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Weikmann et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6930dc81ea1aef094cca248chttps://doi.org/10.1177/10776990251357299
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper