PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 4, 2025BJPsych Bulletin0 citationsOpen Access

Navigating the welfare system and mental health: clinical and ethical reflections on disability assessments

View Full Paper
BHBahaa Hassan

Key Points

  • Mental health can be adversely affected by welfare assessments, particularly in neurodivergent individuals.
  • Findings indicate that shame and loss of agency are prevalent themes among individuals undergoing assessments.
  • Assessment through clinical cases illustrates the detrimental effects of policies like Personal Independence Payment on mental well-being.
  • Advocacy and interdisciplinary collaboration may support individuals with learning disabilities during welfare assessments.

Abstract

Summary Welfare assessments can harm the mental health of neurodivergent individuals and people with intellectual disabilities, yet this remains under-recognised in clinical practice. This article integrates three perspectives: media reporting on private profit in UK disability assessments; a clinical case of an autistic man whose deterioration was triggered by Personal Independence Payment and Universal Credit reassessment; and research on the experiences of people with learning disabilities. Common themes include fear, shame, loss of agency and reactivated trauma. Psychiatrists should view welfare systems as determinants of mental health, adopt trauma-informed, neurodiversity-aware approaches and support patients through advocacy and interdisciplinary collaboration.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bahaa Hassan (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6930dc81ea1aef094cca24fdhttps://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2025.10190
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper