Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the continuing relevance of cadaveric dissection in modern dental education, exploring whether it remains essential for understanding anatomy or if advanced digital alternatives can effectively replace it. It also seeks to assess how dental practitioners perceive their dissection experiences and whether dental students prefer studying full-body anatomy or focusing primarily on the head and neck region. Materials and Methods: A mixed-method approach was used, incorporating surveys and interviews with dental practitioners, educators, and students from multiple institutions. Data were collected on participants’ experiences, perceptions, and learning outcomes related to cadaveric dissection and virtual anatomy tools. The findings were analysed to compare the educational, emotional, and ethical impacts of traditional dissection versus digital simulation methods. Results: Most respondents acknowledged cadaveric dissection as a valuable experience that enhanced their understanding of anatomy, manual dexterity, and confidence in clinical practice. However, many participants also recognised the advantages of virtual and simulated anatomy platforms in terms of accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and ethical comfort. A considerable number of students preferred detailed study of the head and neck region, aligning with the clinical focus of dentistry. Conclusion: Cadaveric dissection continues to hold significant educational value in dental training, particularly for fostering spatial understanding and professional empathy. However, integrating digital dissection tools can complement traditional methods by addressing logistical and ethical concerns. A blended approach appears most effective for anatomy teaching in modern dental education.
Arora et al. (2025) studied this question.