PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 4, 2025Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society0 citationsOpen Access

How is cold, star-forming gas in galaxies affected by magnetic fields?

View Full Paper
KBKamran R J BogueRSRowan J. SmithRTRobin G. Treß

Key Points

  • More compact magnetohydrodynamic disc observed, with radius 5.1 kpc versus 7.4 kpc in hydrodynamic case.
  • Star formation rate drops in magnetic field model to about 4.8 solar masses per year, compared to 8.4 in hydrodynamic model.
  • The addition of magnetic fields raises the threshold gas surface density for star formation significantly.
  • Density and structural differences between models show the role of magnetic fields in the interstellar medium.

Abstract

Abstract Numerical simulations provide a unique opportunity to improve our understanding of the role of magnetic fields in the interstellar medium of galaxies and in star formation. However, many existing galaxy-scale numerical simulations impose a Kennicutt-Schmidt (KS) star formation law by construction. In this paper, we present two Arepo simulations of an isolated star-forming galaxy with and without magnetic fields, using sink particles to model star formation without imposing a KS relation. We examine global differences between the models, and investigate the impacts on star formation. We include a time-dependent, non-equilibrium chemical network coupled to a thermal evolution scheme and supernova feedback. Our magnetic field amplifies via dynamo action from a small initial seed field. We find a more compact magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) disc (radius ∼ 5. 1 kpc, compared to ∼ 7. 4 kpc), with a diffuse atomic envelope above and below the plane that is not seen in the hydrodynamic (HD) case. The HD disc displays a smoother, more even radial distribution of gas and star formation, and more bubbly substructure. Our MHD simulation has a higher proportion of dense, gravitationally unbound gas than the HD case, but a lower star formation rate, an average between 125–150 Myr of 4. 8\, M yr−1 compared to 8. 4\, M yr−1. We see a clear shift in the KS relation to higher gas surface densities in the MHD case, more consistent with observations. The additional magnetic support against gravitational collapse seems to raise the threshold gas surface density required for star formation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bogue et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6930e8d7ea1aef094cca3a08https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf2132
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper