PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 4, 2025Agronomy3 citationsOpen Access

Co-Incorporation of Controlled-Release Urea and Conventional Urea Enhances Rice Yield, Economic Benefits, and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Saline–Alkali Paddy Fields

View Full Paper
ZWZhouzhou WuJLJiaxin LiuJNJiamei Nie

Key Points

  • Nitrogen use efficiency significantly improved with the combination of controlled-release and conventional urea, yielding better results.
  • Field experiment demonstrated increased rice yield and economic benefits, with improvements ranging from 5.10% to 11.04% for different treatments.
  • Controlled-release blended fertilizer treatments led to higher N agronomic efficiency and recovery efficiency, supporting better N management practices.
  • These findings suggest effective strategies for enhancing crop performance in saline–alkali fields with environmentally sustainable fertilization.

Abstract

The combination of controlled-release urea (CRU) and conventional urea (CU) has become an important practical strategy to simultaneously increase rice yield, economic benefits, and nitrogen (N) use efficiency (NUE) with one-time fertilization management. However, the method by which the combination of CRU and CU intervenes with rice yield, economic benefits, and NUE in saline–alkali paddy fields has not yet been established. Accordingly, a two-year field experiment was set up with a total of seven treatments (CK, no N application; CUF, conventional urea split applications; RCUF, CUF treatment with 20% N reduction; CRBF1, 50%CRU + 50%CU one-time base application; CRBF2, 70%CRU + 30%CU one-time base application; RCRBF1, CRBF1 treatment with 20% N reduction; RCRBF2, CRBF2 treatment with 20% N reduction). The results showed that the controlled-release blended fertilizer (CRBF) treatments significantly increased the yield, economic benefits, and NUE over the two years. The CRBF1 and CRBF2 treatments significantly increased the rice yield by 5.10–6.77% and 10.41–11.04%, N recovery efficiency by 13.30–17.40% and 21.69–26.75%, and N agronomic efficiency by 10.40–13.91% and 21.26–22.10% compared to the CUF treatment, respectively. The RCRBF1 and RCRBF2 treatments maintained rice yields and significantly increased NUE compared to the CUF treatment. The analysis of yield components indicated that the greater rice yields of the CRBF were mainly attributed to increased panicle numbers and spikelet numbers per m2. Furthermore, the post-anthesis dry matter, N accumulation, flag SPAD values, flag photosynthetic rates, and soil ammonium nitrogen content were higher during the grain-filling stage of the CRBF treatments compared to the CUF treatments. Compared with the CUF treatment, the CRBF1 and CRBF2 treatments increased economic benefits by 8.74–11.16% and 17.14–17.41%. Therefore, the combination of CRU and CU can increase rice yield, economic benefits, and NUE in saline–alkali paddy fields. Moreover, it is recommended to apply CRU and CU at a ratio of 7:3 in a single basal application as a green and efficient alternative N management strategy for saline–alkali paddy fields. The results provide a scientific basis for N management strategies in saline–alkali paddy fields.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wu et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6930e8dbea1aef094cca3c77https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15122786
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper