PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 8, 2025Environmental Health Engineering and Management3 citationsOpen Access

Sampling of air pollutants by MOFs, COFs, and POFs in needle traps: A systematic review

View Full Paper
AGAmeneh GolbaghiAZAli Faghihi ZarandiZDZabiholah Damiri

Key Points

  • The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of metal-organic frameworks and covalent organic frameworks in air sampling using needle traps.
  • Conducted a systematic review using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science.
  • Assessed key analytical parameters like sampling efficiency and desorption conditions.
  • Validated findings against standard methods like NIOSH.
  • MOFs and COFs exhibited exceptional pollutant capture efficiency with low detection limits.
  • RSM optimization enhanced sensitivity by 20–40% and reduced RSD to <10%.
  • MOFs demonstrated a broad linear dynamic range and high stability, retaining >95% of analytes over time.

Abstract

Background: Air pollution poses significant risks to human health. Advanced sorbents such as metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), covalent organic frameworks (COFs), and porous organic frameworks (POFs) offer high sampling efficiency for airborne pollutants. Integrating these materials into needle trap devices (NTDs) provides a solvent-free approach to air monitoring. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify studies employing MOFs, COFs, and POFs in NTDs for air sampling. Key analytical parameters, including sampling efficiency, desorption conditions, and validation against standard methods (e.g., NIOSH), were assessed. Results: MOF-, COF-, and POF-based NTDs exhibited exceptional pollutant capture efficiency, with detection limits as low as 0.000016 µg/mL (MOFs), 0.0051 µg/mL (PAF-6), and 0.013 µg/mL (COFs) for PAHs, VOCs, and pesticides, respectively. Optimization via response surface methodology (RSM) enhanced sensitivity by 20–40% and reduced relative standard deviations (RSD) to95% of analytes over 60 days of storage, and showed strong agreement (R²=0.97–0.99) with standard methods (e.g., NIOSH 5515, 5600). Notably, MOF-based NTDs achieved a broad linear dynamic range (LDR) of 0.00073–12 µg/mL, outperforming traditional sorbents in trace-level detection. Conclusion: MOF-, COF-, and POF-packed NTDs provide an efficient, cost-effective, and eco-friendly solution for air monitoring. Their high sampling capacity and compatibility with analytical methods highlight their potential for broader applications in occupational and environmental health. Further research should enhance sorbent selectivity and regeneration for improved air quality assessments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Golbaghi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/693624984fa91c937236bff3https://doi.org/10.34172/ehem.1546
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper