PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 8, 2025Frontiers in Veterinary Science2 citationsOpen Access

Pre-purchase screening for Coxiella burnetii in small ruminants: farm acceptance and field evaluation identify the ex-vivo interferon-γ assay as a promising tool

View Full Paper
AMAnneleen MatthijsFCFrançois ClaineASAna Raquel Soares

Key Points

  • The IFN-γ recall assay shows diagnostic accuracy comparable to antibody ELISA under field conditions.
  • A survey indicated significant gaps in awareness of health status and a strong support for pre-purchase screening.
  • The study demonstrates that real-time qPCR and intradermal testing have limited utility in field evaluations of small ruminants.
  • Implementing effective screening methods may reduce zoonotic risk by improving pathogen detection in livestock.

Abstract

Introduction Q fever, caused by Coxiella burnetii , is a disease posing significant zoonotic risk and economic impact, particularly in small ruminants. Screening prior to flock introduction is essential for disease control and prevention, especially in breeding males, given their potential role in pathogen transmission. Methods This study combined a survey of small ruminant farmers with a field evaluation to explore the feasibility of pre-purchase screening and to compare the performance of four diagnostic tests: real-time qPCR, antibody ELISA, intradermal testing, and an ex-vivo interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) recall assay. Results The survey ( n = 114) revealed widespread gaps in health status awareness and a lack of pre-screening during animal lending or borrowing, with regional differences, although most farmers supported pre-purchase screening. The field evaluation across ten farms (five positive and five negative) showed that the IFN-γ recall assay provided diagnostic accuracy comparable to ELISA (DSe: 0.80 vs. 0.74; DSp: 0.94 vs. 0.96), with higher positivity rates among unvaccinated animals ( n = 122; 42.6% vs. 26.2%). The assay also proved feasible for field use, with a 24-hour antigen stimulation protocol performing equally good as the 48-hour version (AUC: 0.99 vs. 0.98). Real-time qPCR and intradermal testing showed the least utility under field conditions. Discussion Overall, the IFN-γ recall assay emerges as a promising diagnostic tool for detecting C. burnetii infection in small ruminants, particularly in settings where vaccination history is unknown or incomplete.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Matthijs et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/693624984fa91c937236c110https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1708200
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper